Legal Opinion
In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 22, 2000No. Nos. 99-197 TFH, 1285PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*297 MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: Downstream Data
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are defendants’ Rule 53 Objections to the Special Master’s Report recommending denial of defendants’ Joint Motion to Compel the Production of Documents. After carefully considering the Special Master’s Report, the defendants’ objections, the plaintiffs’ response, the defendants’ reply, and the entire record herein, the Court will adopt the Special Master’s Report and Recommendations. Specifically, the Court will deny defendants’ Motion to the extent that it seeks an order compelling production of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Betty v. Pace, as Administratrix of the Estate of Floyd J. Pace, Jr., Deceased v. Southern Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Stephen G. Conafay, an Infant, by His Father and Next Friend Stephen R. Conafay v. Wyeth Laboratories, a Division of American Home Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- In re Folding Carton Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Hisler v. Gallaudet UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Independence Federal Savings Bank v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- In re Wellbutrin XLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Robinson v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.