Bloomfield v. Buchanan
Oregon Supreme Court
Multnomah County. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.
This is the second appeal in this cause. The opjinion of this court on the former appeal is reported in 18 Or. 108. It was then found that a partnership existed between plaintiff and defendants, as alleged in the complaint, and that the plaintiff, then the appellant, was entitled to an account, and to ono-fourth of all the profits arising upon the contracts described in the complaint ; and the cause was remanded, that an-accounting might be had. For a fuller statement of the facts, see the former opinion of this court. That accounting has been had, upon which the court below rendered a joint…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Mitchell v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Dawson v. PogueOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Boire v. McGinnOregon Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- Simmons v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Freeman v. DonohoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Kane v. RippeyOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Gill v. Columbia Contract Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.