Legal Opinion
Poust v. Huntleigh Healthcare
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 30, 1998No. Civil Action 94-6063 (MLC)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COOPER, District Judge.
There are two motions before the Court in this matter: (1) defendant Huntleigh Healthcare’s (“Huntleigh”) motion for summary-judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56; and (2) plaintiffs, William and Kimberly Pousts’ motion in limine for an Order applying Pennsylvania law on the issue of the calculation of damages. The Court held a Federal Rule of Evidence 104 hearing on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on November 6 and 7, 1997. Because we have determined that (1) the opinions of Robert Benowitz and Carl Goodman, M.D. are…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Coreen L. SPRAGUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Milanowicz v. Raymond Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- State v. McMullenSuperior Court of Delaware · 2006
- Floorgraphics, Inc. v. News America Marketing In-Store Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Lentz v. MasonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Perkins v. Origin Medsystems Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.