E.D.C. Technologies, Inc. v. Seidel
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
SUSAN ILLSTON, United States District Judge
Now before the Court is defendant Jason Pavlos’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint. Dkt. No. 37. This motion is scheduled to be heard on October 28, 2016. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that this matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will DENY defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts 5 and 7 of plaintiffs amended complaint.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff E.D.C. Technologies, Inc. (“EDC”) is a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Erhart v. Bofi Holding, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- (PS) Trotter v. Con Am GroupDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- 7EDU Impact Academy Inc. v. YouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Ameris Bank d/b/a US Premium Finance v. Joseph Bertolino Insurance Agency Inc. d/b/a Property Shield Insurance Brokerage; Joseph Stewart Bertolino; and Does 1 through 21, inclusiveDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Ascentium Capital LLC v. MaldonadoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.