Legal Opinion
Blaylock v. Borden
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 16, 2008No. 06 Civ. 4387 (DC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this prisoner civil rights case, pro se plaintiff Michael Blaylock alleges that defendants Barry Borden, John Swanson, John Supple, and Jane Doe — all employees of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”) — deprived him of his constitutional rights by failing to protect him from an attack by another inmate, acting with deliberate indifference to his medical needs, and causing him to be wrongfully disciplined.
Defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons that follow, the motion is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Warren v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Conley v. BrysgelDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Dubose v. JiminezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Velez v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Velez-Shade v. Population ManagementDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.