Legal Opinion

Kehoe v. Allen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover for personal injuries. The circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendants, and the sole question presented by the assignments of error is whether the testimony adduced entitled the plaintiff to have his case passed upon by the jury.

The plaintiff is a molder by trade, 27 years old, and has had 12 years’ experience in foundry work. The declaration avers, in substance, that plaintiff was called upon to assist in pouring heated metal into certain molds prepared by others in the employ of defendants, and that he proceeded to and did pour said heated metal into…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rawley v. ColliauMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wachsmuth v. Shaw Electric Crane Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Van den Heuvel v. National Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Thomas v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Furlow v. United Oil MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Grams v. C. Reiss Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API