Legal Opinion

State v. Chapman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1991No. 89-902, 89-903 & 89-904 CA A64174PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*328DE MUNIZ, J.

Defendants were charged with manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(l)(b); ORS 475.992(4)(b). The state appeals the suppression of evidence in a pre-trial hearing. We reverse in part and remand.

On Sunday morning, July 30, 1989, residents of a home on Washington Street in Oregon City noticed that a van had pulled into the driveway of a neighboring house and that two men were walking back and forth between the van and the house. Fearing that a burglary was in progress, they dialed 911. In response, Officer Fourier arrived at 9:25 a.m. and saw a man closing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. GirardOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State v. RubertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. State v. RivasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. GomezMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GabbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Coffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API