Legal Opinion

People v. BRANTE

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 2009No. 07CA0427PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge WEBB.

Whether the Sixth Amendment right to counsel requires that a pro se defendant who voluntarily absents himself from his criminal trial — as contrasted with such a defendant who is held to have waived the right of self-representation by engaging in disruptive behavior — be appointed counsel during his absence has not been decided by the United States Supreme Court and is unresolved in Colorado. We conclude that the trial court’s failure to direct advisory counsel to take control of the case when defendant, Michael Alan Brante, voluntarily absented himself did not violate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. DeWittColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. HerronColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. WarlickNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. John J. EddySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. State v. LaceyOregon Supreme Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API