State v. John J. Eddy
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice FLAHERTY,
for the Court.
Is a trial justice constitutionally required to appoint counsel to represent a pro se defendant who voluntarily absents himself from trial? We hold that neither the United States Constitution, nor article 1, section 10 of the Rhode Island Constitution mandates that counsel be appointed in such a situation. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm the judgment of conviction for three counts of first-degree child molestation sexual assault in violation of G.L.1956 § 11-37-8.1, 1 and two counts of first-degree sexual assault in violation of §…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Kayborn BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
- State v. WarlickNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. LaceyOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Ana M. CruzSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
- State v. Mario SoutoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.