Legal Opinion

State v. John J. Eddy

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 26, 2013No. 2007-236-C.APublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice FLAHERTY,

for the Court.

Is a trial justice constitutionally required to appoint counsel to represent a pro se defendant who voluntarily absents himself from trial? We hold that neither the United States Constitution, nor article 1, section 10 of the Rhode Island Constitution mandates that counsel be appointed in such a situation. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm the judgment of conviction for three counts of first-degree child molestation sexual assault in violation of G.L.1956 § 11-37-8.1, 1 and two counts of first-degree sexual assault in violation of §…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Kayborn BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  2. State v. WarlickNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. LaceyOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. Ana M. CruzSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
  5. State v. Mario SoutoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API