Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Prettyman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 2011No. 94873PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mary J. Boyle, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, the city of Cleveland and police officer Roger Prettyman, appeal from a judgment denying their motion for summary judgment on the basis of immunity. They raise two issues on appeal:

{¶2} “[1.] The trial court erred when it denied the city of Cleveland and Officer Roger Prettyman’s motion for summary judgment, thus depriving them of the benefit of their immunity.

{¶ 3} “[2.] The trial court abused its discretion when it denied the city of Cleveland and Officer Roger Prettyman’s motion to strike paragraph 6 of plaintiff’s affidavit and exhibits B,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cater v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Greene County Agricultural Society v. LimingOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Colbert v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eysoldt v. ProScan ImagingOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Gates v. LeonbrunoOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Wesley v. WalravenOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Johnson v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Bank of Am. v. BobovyikOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API