Legal Opinion

McCroskey v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1922No. 24,064PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 2; Frank D. Hutch-ings, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BurCH, J.:

The action was one for compensation. The plaintiff had settled with the defendant, and had given a release. It was alleged the release was given under a mutual mistake óf fact, and a part of the relief prayed for was that the release be canceled. A demurrer to the petition was overruled, and the defendant appeals.

The portion of the petition against which the demurrer was directed reads as follows:

“Plaintiff further states that at the time of the execution of said release, there was a mutual mistake of fact made by the plaintiff and defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Kirkland v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Gano v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. SpearmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Balmer v. LongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henderson v. National Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Bidnick v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Owens v. DeutchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Walton v. Noel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. Criswell v. Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API