McCroskey v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 2; Frank D. Hutch-ings, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BurCH, J.:
The action was one for compensation. The plaintiff had settled with the defendant, and had given a release. It was alleged the release was given under a mutual mistake óf fact, and a part of the relief prayed for was that the release be canceled. A demurrer to the petition was overruled, and the defendant appeals.
The portion of the petition against which the demurrer was directed reads as follows:
“Plaintiff further states that at the time of the execution of said release, there was a mutual mistake of fact made by the plaintiff and defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Kirkland v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Gano v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Board of County Commissioners v. SpearmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Balmer v. LongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- Henderson v. National Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Bidnick v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Owens v. DeutchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Walton v. Noel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Criswell v. Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.