Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Thompson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1912No. 21,971PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Kosciusko Circuit Court; Waller Brubaker, Special Judge. Action by Roy Huffman against Charles Thompson and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellant filed a complaint for partition of real estate, to which there were answers by appellees alleging indivisibility.

The court on the trial found the land not susceptible of division without damage to the owners, and from that judgment this appeal is prosecuted on the sole ground of the insufficiency of the evidence.

1. No .bill of exceptions was filed at any time. There is a paper attached to the transcript of the pleadings, following the clerk’s certificate, which is called a transcript of the evidence. It has no heading, or similitude to a bill of exceptions, and there is no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Diezi v. G. H. Hammond Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Minnick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Howe v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ebner v. Ohio State Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Winn v. O'NEAL, SHERIFF, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Carmody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Sodders v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API