Legal Opinion

Diezi v. G. H. Hammond Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1901No. 18,994PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

To appellant’s complaint for $10,000 damages for personal injuries, appellee filed a general denial. At the conclusion of appellant’s evidence in chief, appellee unsuccessfully moved the court to direct a verdict for appellee. After appellee’s evidence in defense and appellant’s in rebuttal had all been introduced, the'eourt instructed the jury to return a verdict for appellee. Over appellant’s motion for a new trial, judgment was entered. The only question sought to be presented by appellant is: Was the court’s action in directing the verdict - erroneous ?

' Appellee insists that the bill of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gregory v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wolfe v. McMillanIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of New Albany v. LinesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Minnick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Davis v. Mercer Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. HoulihanIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Westfall v. WaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Heiny, Admx. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API