Legal Opinion
Oppenheimer v. Linkous' Administratrix
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 22, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
M. A. Linkous’ administratrix seeks to recover damages for the death of her decedent growing out of an automobile accident. She charged that W. B. Smoot and Dr. ft. P. Oppenheimer were jointly and severally liable. The jury returned this verdict:
“We, the jury, find a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of ten thousand ($10,000) dollars against the defendants.” It was confirmed by the court which entered this order:
“It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff, Lola M. Linkous, administratrix of M. A. Linkous, deceased, recover against the defendants, W. B. Smoot and R.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Starcher v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
- Wyatt v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Brown v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Price v. BurtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Virginian Railway Co. v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Boykin v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Carney v. DeweesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Cobb v. Indian Springs, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Landers v. French's Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Ironside v. IronsideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.