Parker v. Parker
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — Iíon. C. G. Lee, J udge. Action to recover one-third of the amount defendants received as the purchase price of a farm, with interest. After the evidence in behalf of plaintiff had been introduced, the petition was dismissed as to defendants Frank K,. and Hollis C. Parker. Judgment was entered against the defendant Ned A. Parker, as prayed, and he appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The petition alleges that plaintiff was the owner of an undivided one-third interest in the S. E. % of section 8 in township 86 north, of range 25 west, of the fifth P. M., and that on March 28, 1908, he joined with the defendants, his cotenants, in a conveyance of said quarter section to E. M. and P. M. Hove for the consideration of $11,600, less certain mortgages defendants had ex*67ecuted on their interest therein, which was paid defendants, and he prayed judgment for one-third of said consideration, alleged to have been received by them for his use and benefit, with interest. The answer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mohn v. MohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Chantland v. ShermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Archer v. BarnesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Warner v. HamillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Estate of StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Jackman v. HerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Miksch v. MikschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Bullock v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Richards v. Church Balance-Gear Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911