Legal Opinion

Miksch v. Miksch

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 15, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Washington District Court. — John F. Talbott, Judge. ' Action in equity for the partition of real estate. There was a decree as prayed, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The parties are' children and grandchildren of Joshua Miksch and Susan A. Miksch, his wife, both of whom are now deceased. . Joshua Miksch died in 1879, seized of .the land in controversy. He ■ left a will, which has been duly probated, disposing of his estate in terms, the material part of which reads as follows:

“To my wife, Susan A., I bequeath all the property of which I may die possessed, both real and personal, or so much thereof as may remain after the full payment of all my just debts, to have and to hold during the period' of her natural life. After the death of my wife, it is my will…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mohn v. MohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Byerly v. ShermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. In re Estate of StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Arnold v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sefcik v. ShekerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Bullock v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Fryer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API