Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Martin v. Ekern

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed June 21, 1938:

Nelson, J.

The first question for determination is whether this court should grant leave to the petitioner to *649bring an original action in the name of the state of Wisconsin. Such leave is asked because the attorney general has refused to bring the action. The question which the petitioner seeks to have determined is most important and of great public concern and interest. Obviously the people of this state are vitally interested in seeing that no important office, such as that of lieutenant governor, be intruded into by any person who has not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Attorney-General ex rel. Bashford v. BarstowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re HeilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Martin v. HeilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Mayer v. D'ORTONASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. State Ex Rel. De Concini v. GarveyArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Brunkhorst v. KrennWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API