City and County of San Francisco v. Givens
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.
“The usual paternity suit involves a man, hereafter referred to as the defendant, who does not wish to be declared the father of the child. Because of the accuracy and statistical significance of modern blood testing, the California Legislature has adopted a statutory presumption of paternity. If the defendant’s blood test results in a particular numerical score, he is presumed to be the father. Family Code section 7555 . . . provides in relevant part: ‘(a) There is a rebuttable presumption, affecting the burden of proof, of paternity, if the court finds that the paternity…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. StringhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Plemel v. WalterOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- County of El Dorado v. MisuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Donovan v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Transport Insurance v. TIG InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Luo Yu Jie v. Liang Tai Knitwear Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of San Diego Dept. of Child Support etc. v. G.S. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.