Legal Opinion

Luscher v. Reynolds

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover on a promissory note executed by defendants on May 15, 1930, in the sum of $3,000, evidencing, the balance due on the purchase price of real property. Defendants admit the execution of the note, but allege in answer thereto a counterclaim for damages sustained by reason of a breach of warranty of title. The cause was submitted to a court, without a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff for the amount due on the note. The defendants appeal.

The vital issue in the case relates to the title to a part of the land sold. In 1926, the defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Day v. ArmstrongWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. Longyear Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. J.J.N.P. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Wildlife ResourcesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. McIlroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API