Cochrane v. Quackenbush
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Livingston Quaekenbush from an order of the district court for Le Sueur county, Macdonald, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after a verdict of $7,000 for plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the Court
YaNdeRBUROh, 3*
In April, 1874, the plaintiffs in this action, who had been for several years established in partnership business in Le Sueur, in this state, purchased a stock of hardware of the defendant Livingston Quackenbush, and gave him their joint note therefor for the sum of $1,902, payable in two years, with interest. The note was afterwards transferred to defendant Peter Quaekenbush. Thereafter, in the year 1875, the plaintiffs sold to defendant Halsey *377one-third interest in their partnership business and stock in trade, and the business then proceeded under the joint firm name of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spaids v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Cole v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Patten v. GurneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
- Vanderbilt v. MathisThe Superior Court of New York City · 1856
- Smith v. DennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McPherson v. RunyonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- White v. Western Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Solomon v. VinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Beyersdorf v. SumpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.