Legal Opinion

Mae v. Creagan

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 11, 2013No. Case No. 2:11-cv-00451-LDG (PAL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Fannie Mae’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. #25). Defendants William Creagan and Matthew H. Rattner filed a response in opposition (Doc. #31), and Fannie Mae filed a reply (Doc. # 32).

Deutsche Bank Berkshire Mortgage, Inc. (Deutsche Bank), predecessor-in-interest to Fannie Mae, loaned money to H & B V, LLC (H & B) to purchase an apartment complex. Creagan and Rattner personally guaranteed that H- & B would meet its re-payment obligations, with a maximum liability of $300,000. Subsequently, H & B failed to make…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Estate of Tucker Ex Rel. Tucker v. InterscopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. KirkpatrickDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API