State v. Juarez
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALL, Judge.
¶ 1 After concluding that defendants Jose Alberto Aldana-Juarez 1 and Felipe Jesus Gomes-Pena had “automatic standing” under the Arizona Constitution to contest the admissibility of cocaine seized as a result of the search of a commercial vehicle and trailer, the trial court granted defendants’ motions to suppress because it found that the search exceeded the scope of the consent given and was conducted without probable cause. The state appeals only from the trial court’s ruling that each defendant was entitled to contest the constitutionality of the search and seizure…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. TeagleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State of Arizona v. Robin PeoplesArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Arizona v. William MixtonArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.