Donaghey v. Attorney General
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
This appeal by Vera D. Donaghey, a registered voter of Pinal County, is from the dismissal of her petition for a writ of mandamus for failure to state a claim for relief. She sought to compel appellee, the Attorney General of Arizona, to bring quo war-ranto proceedings challenging the validity of the incorporation election held for the Town of Superior. Since this election was invalid, she argued, the town council election was also invalid and council members were holding office unlawfully. The quo warranto statute, A.R.S. § 12-2041, provides:
“A. An action may be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rideout v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Skinner v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Weisgerber v. Nez Perce CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Folk v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- McLoughlin v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donaghey v. Attorney GeneralArizona Supreme Court · 1978