Legal Opinion

Schrieber v. Clapp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1903PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from the District Gowrt of Garfield County; before . John L. McAtee, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Bueeoed, C. J.:

This is an action for malicious prosecution. The plaintiff, John Sehrieber, Sr., brought his action in the district court of Garfield county against the defendants, Joseph P. Clapp, Cappie Clapp and George Pope, to recover damages for alleged malicious prosecution. The defendants answered denying the averments in the petition, and the cause was called for trial, a jury was empanelled and sworn, and the plaintiff’s attorney made his opening statement. At this stage of the proceedings, counsel for defendants interposed two objections^ one that the petition…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCorkle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Teat v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  5. People v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Loyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Coppage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Sawyer v. ShickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API