Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Paul J. Burroughs, Kenneth Burroughs, Terri Spinner, David Spinner, Sean Harvey, And Ty Harvey v. The City Of Davenport Zoning Board Of Adjustment, The City Of Davenport, Iowa, An Iowa Municipal Corporation, And MZ Annie-Ru Daycare Center, An Iowa Limited Liability Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 25, 2018No. 17-0752Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

APPEL, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

This case involves the proper interpretation of Iowa Code section 414.15 (2015), which governs challenges to decisions of the Board of Adjustment (Board). See Chrischilles v. Arnolds Park Zoning Bd. of Adjustment , 505 N.W.2d 491, 493 (Iowa 1993). This section requires a party to file a petition for writ of certiorari in the district court "within thirty days after the filing of the decision in the office of the board." Iowa Code § 414.15.

The Davenport Municipal Code section 17.52.020(B) (2016) relates to the filing of the Board…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Norland v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. Anderson v. JesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Hinsdale v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Christensen v. Iowa District Court for Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API