Legal Opinion
United States v. Sine
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2007No. 05-10575PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The government’s Motion to Change Wording of Opinion is GRANTED. The opinion filed on May 1, 2007 is hereby amended as follows:
1) On slip op. 4792[483 F.3d at 992] the final two sentences of the paragraph beginning “This appeal arises ...” are replaced with: “Such use of the judge’s statements both created far too great a danger of unfairly prejudicing Sine and introduced impermissible hearsay into the trial.”
2) On slip op. 4795[483 F.3d at 994], the sentence beginning “Also, Sine sued ...” is replaced with: “Also, Sine sued Meddles and Delmarva in Utah again in 2001, this time in both…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- United States v. StinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- United States v. Amy GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. James WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.