Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 1997No. CX-95-1368PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

By looking through the gaps in the closed blinds covering a window, a police officer observed the appellant, Wayne Thomas Carter, as he engaged in a drug-packaging operation with two other persons, one of whom was the leaseholder of the apartment. The district court held that Carter, who was an out-of-state visitor, did not present any evidence to establish his standing to contest the legality of the observation. The court also concluded that the officer did not conduct a search because he made the observations from an area where Carter did not have a reasonable…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State v. GailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API