Legal Opinion

In re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 17, 2012No. MDL No. 1657PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*858 ORDER & REASONS

ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge.

The Court has pending before it Merck’s motion for summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff Sandra Elliott (Rec. Doc. 63872) and Plaintiff Elliott’s motion for an extension of time to respond to Merck’s motion (Rec. Doc. 64004). The Court has reviewed the briefs and the applicable law and now issues this Order and Reasons.

I. BACKGROUND

To put this matter in perspective, a brief review of this litigation is appropriate. This multidistrict products liability litigation involves the prescription drug Vioxx, known generically as Rofecoxib. Merck, a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Walter Burnes v. Pemco AeroplexCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Kane v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Long v. GSDMIdea City, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Kaisha Monique LymonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
  3. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. LymonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
  4. Progressive Security Insurance Company v. WilsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API