Legal Opinion

Blackmon v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided November 5, 1982No. 6141PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

After a jury trial held May 14-15, 1981, Blackmon was convicted of criminal mischief in the third degree. 1 He now appeals, claiming error by the trial court in permitting the state to introduce evidence concerning a confidential conversation between Blackmon and his counsel, Mr. Paul Canar-sky. After careful consideration of the facts in this case, we agree that evidence of the conversation should not have been admitted.

During a recess in the trial, Blackmon and Canarsky had a conversation which was partially overheard by Alaska State Trooper Lowden, a judicial services officer who,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coplon v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. CoplonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Fajeriak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. International Business Machines Corp. v. Sperry Rand Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1968
  5. United States v. Thaddeus Bigos, United States of America v. Dennis RaimondiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farrell v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  2. Haworth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Haworth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Haworth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API