Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Colonial Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 1954PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

Respondent, a widow, seeks to recover $10,000 from appellant under an alleged contract of life insurance of which she is beneficiary. In her first cause she alleges an agreement made April 29, 1953, between her husband and the appellant. These are the allegations: Her husband went to the office of one Max L. Weil, general agent of the appellant, to purchase a life insurance policy, and, after considerable negotiation, he agreed to purchase and Weil agreed to sell a straight life policy in the sum of $10,000; her husband signed an application, was examined by appellant’s doctor, who indicated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Meltzer v. KoenigsbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. More v. New York Bowery Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Topken, Loring & Schwartz, Inc. v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kinns v. SchulzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Whitestone General Hospital v. Intramerica Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Cavallo v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Friedman v. MarkmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  5. Somers v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API