Legal Opinion
Romanik v. Buitrago
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 13, 1980No. 59346PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Judge.
Summary judgment. The evidence shows that Mr. and Mrs. Romanik were the owners of a condominium at 3229 Clairmont Drive which was in a condominium complex known as 3200 Clairmont Drive. The Romaniks had a mortgage on the condominium with Decatur Federal Savings & Loan. The appellees, Mr. and Mrs. Buitrago offered to buy the condominium for $59,000. The Buitragos paid the Romaniks as earnest money $1,000 with closing to occur on September 30, 1978. In the sales contract the condominium was described as being at 3200 Clairmont rather than at 3229. When the closing had to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Raven v. Dodd's Auto Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Colson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- First National Bank v. SpicerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Chewning v. BrandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hendon Properties, LLC v. Cinema Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Swan Kang, Inc. v. Tae Sang Kang (Yi)Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- O'DELL v. Pine Ridge Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Schirmer v. AmorosoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- McClung v. Atlanta Real Estate Acquisitions, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.