Legal Opinion

Schirmer v. Amoroso

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 24, 1993No. A93A0463, A93A0464PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

Hans Schirmer and John Veltri appeal an adverse verdict and judgment in their suit for the return of $15,000 earnest money paid to appellees Amoroso and Brown d/b/a/ A & B Development Company for a building on condominium property. The development was “raw land” when appellants withdrew from the contract. Appellants contend the property was not sufficiently described by the sales contract and attachments to form an enforceable contract under the statute of frauds. OCGA § 13-5-30 (4). See Murphy v. Morse, 96 Ga. App. 513 (100 SE2d 623).

Appellants signed a purchase…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Southeast Ceramics, Inc. v. KlemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Talmadge v. TalmadgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Plantation Land Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. Phillips v. AbelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Murphy v. MorseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weir v. KIRBY CONSTR. CO. INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. First Union National Bank v. Davies-Elliott, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Fuller v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. First Financial Insurance v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. RELIANCE TRUST CO. v. CandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API