Legal Opinion

O'DELL v. Pine Ridge Investments, LLC

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 24, 2008No. A08A1541PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

After a scheduled real estate closing did not occur, both the prospective purchaser and seller claimed entitlement to funds paid as earnest money by the prospective purchaser to the prospective seller. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court awarded the funds to the prospective seller. Because the parties’ underlying real estate agreement was unenforceable due to an insufficient description of the property to be sold, we reverse and remand with direction.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. CDM Custom Homes, Inc. v. WindhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Essuon v. RaynorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Hanners v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. Nhan v. Wellington Square, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Daniel Mill, LLC v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boatright v. Old Dominion Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Paschal v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority Employees Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. OCONEE LAND & TIMBER, LLC v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Parks v. Thompson Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API