Legal Opinion
Dawn v. Essex Conveyors, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 19, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 2809PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
The defendant-by-counterclaims Tennessee Eastman Company moved, inter alia, for a judgment on the pleadings between it and the plaintiffs-by-counterclaim Essex Conveyors, Inc. and Process Equipment Engineering Company, Inc., respectively, relating to the respective counterclaims of the latter. Rule 12(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated in this Court’s memorandum opinion and order herein of March 19, 1973 such motion has merit.
As was stated in 3 Products Liability (Frumer and Friedman) 716, § 44.02 [3] [d] as the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. StevensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Otto T. Schwab v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Cohen v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
- General Dynamics Corporation v. Belle Martha Adams, a Widow, Pan American World Airways v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farrall v. Armstrong Cork Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1983
- Burrell v. RodgersDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Stiles v. Porter Paint Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1976
- Pinzer v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
- Holt v. Utility Trailers Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.