Legal Opinion
Pinzer v. Wood
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided February 28, 1979No. CIV-2-78-84PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
The third-party defendant Kent Uniform Company (Kent) moved the Court to dismiss the third-party claim against it herein on the ground that same is not authorized by Rule 14, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court, having suggested at the pretrial conference that a motion to dismiss such third-party claim for its failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted might be in order, and the present motion essentially contending that, the Court hereby TREATS such motion as one for the dismissal of the third-party claim herein for the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adair v. Koppers Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982
- Connors v. Suburban Propane Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Bancohio National Bank v. Martha Kenny BlandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Connors v. SuburbanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Pond v. MajercikDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996