Legal Opinion
Holt v. Stihl, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided November 22, 1977No. CIV-2-77-23PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
This is a civil action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while using a product which was manufactured and/or sold by the respective defendants. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a)(1), (2), (c). The plaintiff excepted to the pretrial order herein of November 3, 1977, requesting the Court to delete therefrom as a contested issue of fact whether “ * * * any negligence of the plaintiff proximately cause[d] or contribute[d] to cause his injuries and damages. * * * ” The plaintiff contends that any contributory negligence on his behalf is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ellithorpe v. Ford Motor CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- Boatland, Inc. And Robert L. Moore v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Crane v. Sears Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Harold Murphy v. Eaton, Yale & Towne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walsh v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Krosky v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Aaron Bissinger v. New Country BuffettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014