Legal Opinion

Crane v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1963No. Civ. 6960PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN (Gerald), J.

Plaintiff Lorna Crane sued defendant Sears Roebuck & Co., Inc., (hereinafter called Sears) and defendant Universal Paint Corporation, (hereinafter called Universal) to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her when she was burned by fire.

Plaintiff complained in two causes of action against each defendant, one based upon negligence and the other upon breach of warranty of suitability and fitness for purposes intended.

After the parties had rested and the defendants’ motions for directed verdicts were denied a jury verdict favoring plaintiff against both defendants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Dow v. Holly Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Tingey v. E. F. Houghton & Co.California Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API