Legal Opinion

United States v. J.R. LaPointe & Sons, Inc.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided December 30, 1996No. Civil 96-121-BPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

BRODY, District Judge.

This foreclosure action was brought by Plaintiff, the United States, against Defendants, J.R. LaPointe & Sons, Inc. and Daniel R. LaPointe. 1 Plaintiff moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, alleging that no genuine issue of material fact remains in the case. After reviewing all relevant submissions and hearing argument on this matter, the Court agrees with Plaintiff and grants summary judgment for the government.

I. Background

This once complicated action has been significantly simplified by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc. v. Osvaldo CardonaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Howard S. CulverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. Whale Harbor Spa, Inc. v. Thomas E. Wood, as of the Estate of Dorothy W. Wood, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. John Buxton v. Diversified Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Lloyd v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. RosenbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  2. Faulkner v. Arista Records LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Daniel W. Miller and The City of Parkersburg v. Kevin AllmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. SER Katie Franklin v. Hon. R. Craig Tatterson, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. United States v. Hughes Ranch, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API