Tutelman v. Agricultural Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, J.
This is an action against two corporate sureties for damages allegedly caused by the official misconduct of a notary pubfic. The action seeks judgment against the sureties on two notary public bonds, which were required by the provisions of section 8212 of the Government Code.
After respondent-defendants’ demurrer to the cómplaint was sustained with leave to amend, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. The demurrer to the first amended complaint was sustained with leave to amend and plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. • The demurrer to- the second amended…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- McAllister v. C. H. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- State ex rel. Matter v. John Ogden & American Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Inglewood Park Mausoleum Co. v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Werner v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Iselin-Jefferson Financial Co. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976