Legal Opinion

Tutelman v. Agricultural Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1972No. Civ. 38742PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

This is an action against two corporate sureties for damages allegedly caused by the official misconduct of a notary pubfic. The action seeks judgment against the sureties on two notary public bonds, which were required by the provisions of section 8212 of the Government Code.

After respondent-defendants’ demurrer to the cómplaint was sustained with leave to amend, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. The demurrer to the first amended complaint was sustained with leave to amend and plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. • The demurrer to- the second amended…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McAllister v. C. H. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State ex rel. Matter v. John Ogden & American Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Inglewood Park Mausoleum Co. v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Werner v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Iselin-Jefferson Financial Co. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API