Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Lipic v. Flynn

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 13, 1948No. 40987PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[446]

ELLISON, J.

Prohibition to represent Judge Flynn of the circuit court, city of St. Louis. The underlying contest is between two estates, each claiming the same assets. Relators, as executors of one estate, challenge Judge [447] Flynn’s jurisdiction to entertain a suit against them in the circuit, court for conversion of those assets. That conversion suit was filed by the administratrix of another estate after she had already brought a proceeding against relators in the probate court to discover the same assets, under Sec’s 63-67, R. S. 1939, Mo., R. S. A., which latter proceeding is still…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sullivan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Lolordo v. LacySupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Gately v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Tygard v. FalorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Love v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lipic v. WheelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. City National Bank & Trust Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Mathews v. PrattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Brede Decorating, Inc. v. Jefferson Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. White v. HuttonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API