Legal Opinion

Allen County Bar Ass'n v. King

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1990No. 89-1131PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree that *10respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), and we adopt the board’s recommendation. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Master v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Committee on Legal Ethics v. BoettnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Allen County Bar Ass'n v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API