Legal Opinion

Lay v. Parsons

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1894No. 15318PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

This is a contest under section 1111 of the Code of Civil Procedure, involving the right of the parties thereto to the office of supervisor in district No. 1 in Santa Cruz county. The contest involved simply a question as to which of the parties had received the highest number of legal votes for that office at the general election in November, 1892, and the trial, as is usual in such instances, consisted substantially in a recount of the ballots from the precincts comprised within the supervisor district. The court found that the respondent had received three hundred and seventeen votes, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Searcy v. GrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Minor v. KidderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Lord v. DunsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Dickerman v. GelsthorpeMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People v. Town of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Rampendahl v. CrumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API