Legal Opinion
Moore v. Day
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1954No. Civ. 8306PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Respondents commenced an action against appellant to recover damages for breach of contract. Their amended complaint alleged in substance that on or about March 1, 1948, the parties entered into an oral contract whereby appellant agreed to purchase 83,670 pounds of beans from respondents at 17% cents per pound; that on numerous occasions thereafter appellant stated that he would take the beans at such price but that he wished to defer delivery; that on August 17, 1948, appellant specifically told respondents that he would accept the beans and pay 17% cents per pound therefor on September 10,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Albert H. And Doris G. Throndson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Albert H. And Doris G. Throndson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, J. Leonard Schmitz and Alice Schmitz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- San Francisco Brewing Corp. v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Pruitt v. FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Irving Tier Co. v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.