Legal Opinion
Herrmann v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 13, 2017No. 14-941TPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Pre-trial motions in limine; testimony by witnesses in person at trial rather than by contemporaneous video transmission; RCFC 43(a); RCFC 45(c); removal of attorneys’ eyes only designation for certain documents and information; testimony of a witness who prepared summaries; Fed. R. Evid. 1006
ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Pending before the court in this tax case are three pre-trial motions in limine, filed December 21, 2016. The first motion in li-mine, submitted by non-parties John Paul-son, Christopher Bodak, Paulson & Co. Inc., and Paulson Europe LLP (“PELLP”), seeks permission for Mr. Paulson and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Colon-Fontanez v. Municipality of San JuanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Frank Music Corp. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Harold Dean Behrens, James D. Wilkett, James M. Wilkett, and Fred WeedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. BoesenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Herrmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017