Legal Opinion
Cincinnati v. Queen City Lodge, Unpublished Decision (4-1-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 2005No. C-040454UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellee, the city of Cincinnati, fired Cincinnati Police Officer Victor Spellen following his admission that he had lied under oath while testifying during the criminal jury trial of a fellow police officer. An arbitrator appointed pursuant to the collective-bargaining agreement between the city and defendant-appellant, Queen City Lodge No. 69, Fraternal Order of Police (hereinafter, "FOP"), sustained the grievance filed by the FOP on Spellen's behalf. The arbitrator ordered that Spellen be reinstated and that his termination be reduced to a three-day suspension.
{¶…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ohio Office of Collective Bargaining v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 11Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Queen City Lodge No. 69 v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Jones v. Franklin County SheriffOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Board of Trustees of Miami Township v. Fraternal Order of PoliceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Cincinnati v. Queen City Lodge No. 69Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 627 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ironton v. RistOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- N. Royalton v. UrichOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Fraternal Order of Police v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2005