Legal Opinion

Queen City Lodge No. 69 v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1992No. 91-647PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

In considering this matter, we must determine the following: (1) Was the arbitrator empowered to award any remedy for the contract violation that had occurred? and (2) If so, must the remedy which the arbitrator awarded be modified, corrected, or vacated?

I

Power to Award a Remedy

The court of appeals reasoned that the arbitrator’s award was on a “nonsubmitted” matter. After deciding that the matter of a remedy was not submitted to the arbitrator, the court of appeals concluded that it was required by R.C. 2711.11(B) to find that the trial court erred in not granting the city’s motion to modify…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Mahoning County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Mahoning County TMR Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Miller Brewing Company v. Brewery Workers Local Union No. 9, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Local Union No. 200, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ohio Office of Collective Bargaining v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 11Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Cedar Fair, L.P. v. Falfas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Motor Wheel Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Miller v. GunckleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Miller v. GunckleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Board of Trustees of Miami Township v. Fraternal Order of PoliceOhio Supreme Court · 1998

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API