Legal Opinion

State v. Tapp

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 2001No. 25295PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Christopher C. Tapp appeals from his conviction for first degree murder and rape. Tapp argues that the district court erred by not suppressing the statements he made in a series of police interviews. In the alternative, he contends the sentences imposed are excessive.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Early in the morning of June 13, 1996, Angie Dodge was raped and stabbed to death in her apartment in Idaho Falls. On January 7, 1997, twenty-year-old Christopher Tapp voluntai'ily submitted to police questioning about this crime at the Law Enforcement Building (LEB) in Idaho Falls.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HarmsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. State v. Chris Allen StoneIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Christopher Conley Tapp v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. Carlos Orlando ZamoraIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. Scott NicholsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API