Legal Opinion

In Re Rambus Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 15, 2012No. 2011-1247; Reexamination 90/010,420PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”) appeals a final decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) in a reexamination in which claim 18 of Rambus’s U.S. Patent No. 6,034,918 (“'918 Patent”) was found invalid as anticipated. Because substantial evidence supports the PTO’s determination that claim 18, as correctly construed reads on the “memory module” in the prior art iAPX 432 Interconnect Architecture Reference Manual published by Intel Corp. in 1982 (“iAPX Manual”), this court affirms.

I. Background

A. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. In Re Lavaughn F. Watts, JrCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. In Re Gilbert P. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Lisle Corporation v. A.J. Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wasica Finance GmbH v. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  2. Rambus Inc. v. ReaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Inre: Rambus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. In Re: Csb-System International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  5. Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API