Legal Opinion
Inre: Rambus, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 4, 2014No. 2013-1192PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an inter partes reexamination of claims 26 and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 6,426,916 (“the '916 patent”). The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) found that the claims were anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 4,734,909 to Bennett (“Bennett”). Patent owner Rambus, Inc. (“Rambus”) appeals the Board’s anticipation decision, arguing that Bennett does not disclose the claimed “value that is representative of an amount of time to transpire after which the memory device outputs the first amount of data.”
Afte…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Exxon Research and Engineering Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- In Re Yujiro Yamamoto, and Dictaphone Corp., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Werner KotzabCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Investpic LLC v. International Business Machines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications RF, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Straight Path Ip Group, Inc. v. Sipnet Eu S.R.O.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.