Thompson v. Lynch
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the Court below, and defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court/
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, J.
As to the defendant, Lynch, administrator of Hill—the only party who has appealed—this is an action to restrain him from selling, under an order of the Probate Court, the interest *190of the intestate, Hill, in the premises described in the complaint, and thereby casting a cloud upon plaintiff’s title. It is conceded that Hill formerly owned the land, and that plain- ' tiff has acquired, by conveyances from him and his grantees, five undivided sevenths. The plaintiff also claims that he has acquired the title to the remaining two undivided sevenths through conveyances from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pixley v. HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Landers v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Shattuck v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by12 opinions
- Perkins v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. FlukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Huntington v. Central Pac. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1874
- Chamberlain v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Bryan v. TormeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.